Sydney Clearance Rates and What They Tell Us About Tech Adoption


Every Saturday evening, I check the auction clearance rates. It’s a habit from my agency days that I’ve never dropped, even now that I consult more than I sell.

But lately, I’ve been tracking something else alongside the headline numbers: the correlation between agency technology adoption and auction performance. The patterns are starting to tell a story.

The Numbers Right Now

Sydney’s clearance rate has bounced between 55% and 72% this year. That volatility reflects an uncertain market where buyers have options and vendors need to price realistically.

The Eastern Suburbs have held stronger—typically 5-8 percentage points above the city average. The Inner West has softened. Western Sydney shows the most variation week to week.

These headline numbers get all the attention. But they obscure meaningful differences between agencies operating in the same markets.

The Performance Gap I’m Seeing

Here’s what caught my attention. Across 15 agencies I’ve worked with this year in overlapping Sydney markets, there’s a consistent pattern: agencies with strong digital infrastructure are outperforming their traditional competitors.

I’m not talking about a slight edge. The top-performing agencies are achieving:

  • 12-18% higher clearance rates than area averages
  • 15-25% fewer days on market
  • Stronger prices relative to automated valuations

These aren’t cherry-picked examples. The pattern holds across different price points and suburbs.

What the Leaders Are Doing Differently

When I dig into what separates the high performers, technology keeps emerging as the common thread.

Pre-Auction Buyer Engagement

The traditional auction playbook is straightforward: four weeks of open homes, phone follow-ups, auction day. It worked for decades.

The agencies pulling ahead have layered digital engagement throughout the campaign. They’re using:

  • Virtual tours that let buyers self-filter before physical inspections
  • Automated market update emails that maintain contact without manual effort
  • CRM workflows that track engagement signals and prioritise follow-up

One agency in the Inner West told me their auction registration rates have increased 40% since implementing systematic digital nurture. More registered bidders means more competition on the day.

Data-Informed Pricing

Vendor expectations are the eternal challenge. The best agencies now use technology to ground those conversations in evidence rather than opinions.

They pull automated valuations from multiple sources—CoreLogic, PropTrack, PriceFinder. They show vendors exactly what comparable properties achieved, with settlement data, not asking prices.

When a vendor’s price expectation is unrealistic, having three independent data sources aligned makes that conversation easier than “trust my experience.”

The result: fewer properties going to auction with unrealistic reserves, fewer passed-in results, better clearance rates.

Buyer Intelligence

This is where things get interesting. Some agencies have started tracking buyer behaviour across their digital properties in ways that inform auction strategy.

They know which buyers have viewed the virtual tour multiple times. They know who’s opened every email. They know who’s requested the contract for sale.

This intelligence shapes auction day tactics. Agents know who’s serious before a single bid. They can manage vendor expectations with buyer evidence, not gut feel.

The Technology Stack Behind the Results

The high-performing agencies share common technology choices:

CRM (AgentBox or Rex) A proper CRM isn’t optional for this level of performance. The automation and tracking capabilities are foundational.

Market Data (PriceFinder + CoreLogic) Multiple data sources for vendor conversations and pricing strategy.

Digital Marketing (Realtair + Quality Virtual Content) Professional presentations and comprehensive property media.

Buyer Engagement Tracking Some agencies are now integrating tools from AI consultants Sydney like Team400 for AI-powered buyer behaviour analysis. Early days, but the results are promising.

What Traditional Agencies Are Missing

The agencies struggling in this market share patterns too—usually defined by what they haven’t adopted.

Manual-Only Follow-Up Relying entirely on agents remembering to call buyers back. In a busy campaign, contacts fall through cracks. Automation ensures consistent touch points.

Thin Digital Presence Basic portal listings, minimal social media, no video content. These agencies are invisible to the growing segment of buyers who research entirely online before reaching out.

Gut-Feel Pricing Experienced agents have good instincts. But instincts don’t show vendors why a price expectation is unrealistic. Data does.

Paper-Based Vendor Reporting Some agencies still provide vendor feedback verbally or on generic templates. The leaders send automated weekly reports with enquiry data, engagement metrics, and market context.

The Clearance Rate Feedback Loop

Here’s the mechanism I think explains the performance gap.

Better technology enables more informed pricing conversations. More realistic pricing leads to more successful auctions. Higher clearance rates build vendor confidence. Confident vendors refer other vendors. Success compounds.

The reverse is equally true. Agencies stuck in traditional methods take on overpriced listings, fail at auction, develop poor clearance rate reputations, and find it harder to win new business.

Technology isn’t the only factor—good agents matter enormously. But technology increasingly separates good agencies from great ones.

What This Means for the Market

I expect the performance gap to widen further over the next 12-18 months. The technology is improving, and early adopters are building compounding advantages.

Vendors are becoming more sophisticated too. They check agency track records online. They compare marketing capabilities. They notice which agencies have professional presentations versus who’s winging it with iPhone photos.

The agencies that survive the inevitable industry consolidation will be those that built proper digital infrastructure. The stragglers will either adapt or become acquisition targets for more progressive groups.

Practical Steps for Agencies

If you recognise your agency in the “traditional” description, here’s a realistic path forward:

  1. CRM audit: Is your current system being used properly? Often agencies have tools they’re barely scratching the surface of.

  2. Automation inventory: Map every repeated communication in your sales process. Identify what can be automated without losing personal touch.

  3. Data source review: Are you using property data in vendor conversations? If not, start with PriceFinder or CoreLogic as a minimum.

  4. Content quality assessment: Compare your listing presentation to the top performers in your area. Be honest about the gap.

  5. Training investment: Technology only works if teams use it. Budget for proper training, not just tool subscriptions.

The clearance rate leaderboard reshuffles every week. The question is whether your agency will be climbing or falling.


Linda Powers tracks Sydney real estate technology adoption as part of her PropTech consulting practice. She spent 25 years in Sydney real estate, including 15 years running an agency in the Eastern Suburbs.